Jump to content
  • πŸš€ Join the Uncrowned Addiction Community Today! πŸš€

    Say Goodbye to Ads and Hello to Tech Talk!

    πŸ‘‹ Hey there, tech enthusiast! Noticed those pesky ads? Well, we've got great news for you! Sign up for free at Uncrowned Addiction and enjoy an ad-free experience as part of our vibrant tech community.

    Why Join Us?

    • Friendly Community: Connect with fellow tech lovers in a welcoming and supportive environment.
    • Engaging Discussions: From the latest tech trends to timeless tech debates, dive into discussions that matter to you.
    • Share Your Knowledge: Got tech insights or questions? This is your platform to share, learn, and grow.
    • Ad-Free Browsing: Once you're a member, those AdSense ads disappear, making your experience smoother and more enjoyable.

    Becoming part of Uncrowned Addiction means joining a community where your love for technology is shared and celebrated. Sign up now and start your journey with us – where curiosity meets community!

    πŸ‘‰ Join us – it's free, it's fun, and it's all about tech!Β πŸ‘ˆ

  • AdSense Advertisement


  • AdSense Advertisement


  • AdSense Advertisement


Recommended Posts

Posted

Social Media Firm X Challenges California's Anti-Deepfakes Legislation

The AB 2655, an anti-deepfake law in California, has recently come under legal scrutiny by X, the social media enterprise belonging to Elon Musk. As per Bloomberg's reporting, the company has instituted legal proceedings aimed at blocking this California law. AB 2655 binds large internet platforms to either label or eliminate artificial intelligence-powered deepfakes, particularly those pertaining to electoral matters.

Assertion of Unintended Political Censorship

X maintains that the AB 2655 law, which is alternatively recognized as the β€œDefending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024,” could inadvertently culminate in extensive suppression of political dialogue. The company has formally voiced its concerns in a late-night complaint lodged in the Sacramento federal court on Thursday. It emphasizes the historical precedence of robust First Amendment protections applicable to critical commentary relating to public office contenders and government officials. It further underscores the traditionally high tolerance levels for potentially incorrect statements within such contexts.

The Burden of Compliance and Recent Legal Developments

Apart from mandatory deepfake labelling or removal, AB 2655 further imposes several regulations that X perceives as burdensome. These include the creation of channels for reporting politically motivated deepfakes and a system for politicians and elected representatives to pursue injunctions if they perceive that a platform is not working in alignment with the act.

This lawsuit is a recent development in the contentious debate about online transparency and political deepfakes, coming just weeks after another relevant California law that sought the prohibition of dishonest online campaign adverts was briefly impeded by a federal judge.


View full article

AdSense Advertisement


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • AdSense Advertisement


  • AdSense Advertisement


  • AdSense Advertisement


Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.