Jump to content
  • AdSense Advertisement


  • AdSense Advertisement


  • AdSense Advertisement


  • Uncrowned Guard
    Uncrowned Guard

    Social Media Firm X Challenges California's Anti-Deepfake Law

      TL;DR: X, Elon Musk’s social media firm, is legally challenging California's AB 2655—“Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024”—arguing it may lead to political censorship by mandating the labeling or removal of AI-driven deepfakes on large platforms. The company contends the law could suppress political discourse protected by the First Amendment, highlighting concerns about high compliance burdens, like reporting channels for political deepfakes and injunction measures for politicians. This legal action follows a recent judicial halt of another state law targeting misleading online campaign ads, underscoring the ongoing debates over transparency and regulation of digital political content.

    Social Media Firm X Challenges California's Anti-Deepfakes Legislation

    The AB 2655, an anti-deepfake law in California, has recently come under legal scrutiny by X, the social media enterprise belonging to Elon Musk. As per Bloomberg's reporting, the company has instituted legal proceedings aimed at blocking this California law. AB 2655 binds large internet platforms to either label or eliminate artificial intelligence-powered deepfakes, particularly those pertaining to electoral matters.

    Assertion of Unintended Political Censorship

    X maintains that the AB 2655 law, which is alternatively recognized as the “Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024,” could inadvertently culminate in extensive suppression of political dialogue. The company has formally voiced its concerns in a late-night complaint lodged in the Sacramento federal court on Thursday. It emphasizes the historical precedence of robust First Amendment protections applicable to critical commentary relating to public office contenders and government officials. It further underscores the traditionally high tolerance levels for potentially incorrect statements within such contexts.

    The Burden of Compliance and Recent Legal Developments

    Apart from mandatory deepfake labelling or removal, AB 2655 further imposes several regulations that X perceives as burdensome. These include the creation of channels for reporting politically motivated deepfakes and a system for politicians and elected representatives to pursue injunctions if they perceive that a platform is not working in alignment with the act.

    This lawsuit is a recent development in the contentious debate about online transparency and political deepfakes, coming just weeks after another relevant California law that sought the prohibition of dishonest online campaign adverts was briefly impeded by a federal judge.


    Image Credit: Photo by Sebastiaan Stam from Pexels: https://www.pexels.com/photo/silhouette-of-man-1480690/

    Todd "Uncrowned Guard" Badman is an avid tech enthusiast with a deep passion for consumer technology, especially home servers and self-hosted solutions. With extensive experience in setting up and managing personal tech environments, Todd is dedicated to empowering users to take control of their digital lives. He strives to provide clear, unbiased information to help others navigate the ever-evolving world of technology with confidence and ease.

    Email Todd | Visit Profile | Direct Message

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • News Categories

  • AdSense Advertisement


  • AdSense Advertisement


  • AdSense Advertisement


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.